Category: Uncategorised

  • for the times….

    Press play for the audio recording of this blog

    An old friend messaged me to say that they had been reading my blog (this blog) I had forgotten that I had a blog if I’m totally honest 

    A nice remembering that made me think how good it would be to write another post. 

    I realise that I seem to come back here during phases of liminality, when the world I knew and the yet to come appear so intractably distant that bridging seems more a leap of faith than an actual engineering possibility. Maybe there is something in claiming that gulf through the eyes of unknown readers that helps me process. Or maybe that I’m just a massive narcissist without the ready audience of a team of people paid to listen to me and so this becomes the pill. Either way. Here I am, trying to find the shy words that lull at the deepest recesses of my knowing to answer the question that keeps arriving in my DMs – so where are you now?

    Where I am

    Well easy enough, sitting at my desk, typing at my keyboard, the same desk and keyboard and monitor that I wrote the Management Plan on and that I answered emails for the woodland trust from (albeit for a shorter time). a desk, an orange seat, an attic, surrounded by books.

    I don’t think that is what the ask is though.

    I think what people are asking is where does this computer point at? who pays the hands to type out words for them?

    And that is more difficult to put into words.

    No one and everyone.

    your sons and your daughters are beyond your command

    Many of you know me from the work I did as lead author of a Management Plan for Bannau. It was a policy  document like no other for many reasons, but mostly because my co-writer Jodie and I believed it needed a really strong narrative arc.  It should start with the legacy National Parks inherited from their inception to be resources for the nation in need of healing after the second world war. and end with the start of a different legacy.  Very purposefully I wanted the last lines left hanging with the reader to just be a small moment of insight about why the words of the plan mattered. They were personal, but they were also way bigger than me.  Here they are 

    How I do it though, no such glib exclamations of saviour mother, I live each day with no expectations of any achievement other than to have gotten through the day. 

    That young son, no longer exists.  They are now a beautiful wonderful clever fourteen year old whose amazing neurodivergent brain has found much of the world around them uncommonly fascinating and unbelievably frightening.  Full of assumptions that do not add up, that hurt and terrorise, that subjugate and destroy I have watched them slowly disappear as they attempt to navigate a world built for neuro typical minds. 

    It hurts to watch the destruction of such wonder.  A grief that overpowers as the  silent retreat into themselves deepens. 

    and don’t criticise what you don’t understand

    About 18months ago my eldest child agonised with something they needed to tell me.  They were 12. 

    Up until that point in time they had been a happy enough kid. In many ways extraordinary, in most ways normal.

     I always thought that they were an old soul, like they looked at the world like they had seen it before and in a way already knew all the things they wanted to know. Like it was nothing new.  They were talking in full sentences by 2.  Reading by 3.  Reading maps by 5.  They sounded like a little old man.  They loved the company of adults, reading stories, riding on trains, his reception teacher told me that they used to just sit and chat . As they grew older each year their teachers would call us in, once we had a teacher who suggested that they believed our child was hearing voices and emotionally disturbed. Another who suggested that they may need glasses because they kept getting up and wandering about, another who suggested that my request for an autism diagnosis (first raised with the ‘wonderful character’ teacher) was probably a good idea because she was actually struggling. 


    Mostly though just a geek kid doing geeky things, having fun with their geeky friends.  Loving and kind, a worrier, the most amazing imagination, a believer in magic.

    But things had started to change as they headed into year 8.  They seemed to be less interested in their friends, had periods of complete withdrawal from the world. And most distressingly their self soothing stimming ticks had progressed from hand wringing to physical aggression towards themselves.  We would see a disturbing level of self admonishment, of constant apology, of real self directed vitriol.  We spoke to the school about the ND assessment (they had been on a waiting list for assessment for four years by this point) and it was agreed for additional support to be put into place regardless of the diagnosis. Problem solved. 

    And then April 2024 on a family day out in Dyffryn Gardens it felt like we’d hit some kind of crisis. They kept saying, Mum I’m…. And then just freezing.  For anyone who knows me and my overly active ADHD will know that I attempted every way I could to finish that sentence, each time I offered a solution, their frustration would grow and again, ‘ no listen Mum I’m’  – silence. This went on for days and days with the frustration they felt spilling out into every interaction, every thread, each elements of family life.  It felt like living in a Samuel becket play. Resolution was nowhere to be found. 

    Finally after about a week of the stop start confessions,  they showed me a drawing in their sketch book, a sort of anime style quirky hair, eyeballs and bows, the name Sophia was written above the image.  I know that this is a cliché but in that moment I just knew, maybe it was the look on her face, it was the same as the desperation to talk as the days of stunted explanations, maybe it was the hope that finally flickered there too.  But as soon as I saw the picture I knew.  

    ‘Is this you?’
    A nod, and a look of deep deep shame
    ‘Do you want me to call you Sophia now?’ 
    ‘Sorry’ quietly offered to me under heavy heavy tears.

    Now I wish I had something really profound to tell you about my reaction. 

    I was both in shock at the realisation that my son was telling me that they wanted to be something totally different,  and huge relief that they weren’t attempting to tell me that they had killed a kitten or something equally abhorrent over the past few days of stuttering revelation. 

    I cannot remember what I said, it may have been thank fuck I thought you’d killed a kitten. It may have just been a hug. All I know is that everything changed from that point. 

    please get out of the new one if you can’t lend your hand

    I reverted to type and researched the hell out of trans kids and I read many many first hand accounts of both growing up trans and raising trans kids.  This from Carolyn Hays is by far the words that have been most instrumental to me in that journey

    A statistic. … one that finds almost every parent of a transgender child, one way or another. The suicide attempt rate. At the time, the stat was that 46 percent of trans people had attempted suicide at some point in their lives. For the general population, that rate is less than 2 percent. I’ve kept my eye on this stat over the years. I’ve seen it range from 41 percent to 47 percent, and when broken down, I’ve seen it as high as 51 percent for trans boys and men. Now there is really clear research that explains how to bring that statistic down to the below 2 percent of the general population. It’s this: acceptance, support. If parents, schools, faith communities, neighbors, and relatives shift pronouns, let the kid decide how they need to present themselves to the world — hair, clothes, name — the risk of suicide for that child plummets.

    and so their old identity became known as ‘the redacted’ and we begun systematically replacing the child Dylan I thought I birthed, with the person she was learning she was.  The bag of eyeballs and bows that started off as Sophia on a shaky notebook, morphed into Deska a hoody wearing non-binary , and now is currently known as Nell.  Nell has fully socially transitioned, including in school,  and identifies with the she/her and they/them pronouns.  She says ‘I’m like 75% female right now’ although to me she is just 100% themselves 

    That is where the bits of the story I can easily explain end. 

    The rest is a spaghetti like jumble of threads that all seem to lead nowhere and everywhere at once, but mostly to this place.

    I have left my paid job as nell cannot attend mainstream school anymore, I support her in homeschool which mostly now happens online.  This is not because of the school, they have been amazing.  Shout out to Delyth.  We love you.

    No it is because gender dysphoria is so crippling to them that they live their lives in a deep cloak of shame and anxiety that prevents them from feeling worthy of engaging in normal life. Have you ever watched a child so desperate to join in and be normal and hang out with other kids, and yet so unable to find the way that they freeze in fear and sadness and you as a parent have to stand and watch, physically and mentally unable to make any of it better.  

    This is all exacerbated by the challenges of intersecting diagnosis.

    Nell is as both neuro and gender diverse. Which it turns out is not that uncommon.  Again some stats – gender diversity in the general population falls between 1 and 2%.  Whereas amongst autistic population a much higher prevelance is observed, with studies placing it anywhere between 10-35%.

     However, the support available to Nell under CAMHS is either additional learning support for autism (which Nell describes as dehumanising and belittling) or talking therapy for the gender dysphoria (see above for the difficulty Nell has in communicating how she feels in words).  And because neither have provided the help that Nell actually needs we seem to be at some sort of impasse where the educational welfare officer writes to ‘the parent/or guardian’ to threaten £2,500 worth of fines with about as much empathy for the repeated trauma our family is experiencing as a wet fish. 

    the line it is cast

    There is a story I found recently, tucked away in an old copy of The Womanly Art of Breastfeeding, first purchased when I became a mother all those years ago that resonated in its totality.  

    A mother explains what it felt like to find herself unexpectantly birthing a child with physical disability,  she describes it like a trip to Italy that gets diverted. You pack your bags for the Coliseum and the gondolas, she says,, you learn the phrases, you buy the guidebooks. But when the plane lands, the stewardess tells you: “Welcome to Holland”.  

    Holland is slower. It’s less flashy. But she reflects if you spend your life screaming that you were supposed to be in Italy, you will never see that Holland has windmills, and tulips, and Rembrandts.  

    I am learning to walk in Holland. I am learning to put down the guidebooks for the child I thought I had, and simply sit with the one who is here as we both learn how we can survive in this new world together

    This brings me back to the desk, and the orange chair, and the question of “where are you now, what do you do?”

    I am no longer the person with the extension number. But I am also not disappeared.

    In stepping away from the 9-to-5, I have carved out a different kind of space. The part of me that needs to work—the part that thinks in systems and writes in strategies, that you may want to tag in a LinkedIn post, or talk an idea through with —is still very much here, still very much needs to be listened to.

    But now, that part of me I see as a far more  precious resource, one I can no longer afford to spend on things that do not matter.  In the coming weeks I’ll be posting more about that person her work and her wonderful CIC with the beautiful and brilliant Jodie Bond at Landed futures.  How the flexibility of freelancing has provided me with the necessary space to be all that I need to be.  But for now I felt it important that I make this truth known to the world. 

    It will form a massive part of who I become and the person you will hopefully stay in touch with as I learn to read a different map, for the times they are a changin’

    With love and apologetic thanks to the many Dylans in my life for helping me anchor these words to the page.

  • National Parks v2.0

    National Parks v2.0

    Made in Wales

    <prefer to listen here>

    There’s something about human nature and anniversaries that I can’t quite get my head around.

    I get birthdays, and remembering the passing of friends and loved ones. 

    But are organisational anniversaries a thing?

    We seem obsessed with using these points in time as key anchors from which to announce the next big thing, launch strategies, make a point

    Its like a way to underline a significance of something more than

    I’m not judging, just you know, observing. 

    And reflecting, because I’m really guilty of this too. Despite the sage advice of our once head of comms who warned (repeatedly)against such practice with the sweet bluntness of the best PR professional. Her smile declaring that no one outside of the  organisation would give two hoots about it being some random number of years since such and such law was passed. We on the inside may think we have reached some crucial moment that obviously has be celebrated, but it won’t be obvious or crucial to anyone on the outside, unless we make it so.

    Basically, it’s the message that counts, regardless of what day of the year it is.

    Her words have been on an uneasy loop in my mind these last few days.

    My linked in feed has been a wash with posts of friends, colleagues and fellow designated landscape associates celebrating the 75th anniversary of National Parks and National Landscapes within England and Wales.  I have seen these proliferate in number,  and added my likes, and hearts, and support emoji responses.  The posts are all on a theme

    There is the beauty of real pride of our heritage, a part of the great post war nation building.  A recognition and remembering of a time when governments did brave and wonderful things like  protecting these vast tracts of landscape for the benefit of the each and every one of us. But most of these posts feel like a warning tinged with a fear, an undercurrent of grief, of potential thwarted, legacy lost through successive rounds of funding cuts.  The fear for the future if more money cant be found. 

    I also feel this fear viscerally, but I have a horrible and sinking concern, that just calling out the systemic failure in funding will be insufficient to actually ensure the survival of ‘protected landscapes’.  I’m not sure spending more on a broken system will in itself fix the system.

    I say all this with a heavy heart.  Anyone who knows me, knows how passionate I am about the role of protected landscapes in a fair and just society.

    I have been obsessed with the movement since I was 11 years old.  Our annual camping trips to Beddgelert forest in Eryri – the pinnacle of my working-class-city-dwelling family’s year.  Those days spent in the hills narrated by my father (big in the union) retelling tales of my forebears fight to secure this right for us, to enjoy the countryside, unhindered, for free. 

    Tales of the kinder mass trespass, the Manchester Rambler, somehow instilled in me a deep connection between these spaces of nature, and beauty, and how they were a gift to me which I held in the same level of thanks and reverence as other great benevolent acts, like the right to vote, or free healthcare.  In my young mind it conjured imaginings of Edwardian lady Suffragettes, hoofing up petticoated skirts to  march triumphant over the Llanberis pass whilst declaring the countryside the right of us all, whilst handing out free ice-creams.  Those holidays led to the kind of obsessive hobby, which much later with the benefit of a ND diagnosis, I would come to understand as the formation of the most lasting of all my autistic ‘special interests’.  (turns out its not just dinosaurs, or trains that occupy neurodivergent minds). 

    It also led to a lifetime of love and connection and belief in the importance of protecting these environments, a love that eventually, by some form of serendipity, or the universe’s great plan (you choose),  turned into a successful and rewarding career in strategic policy.  A career which took me from 29 yr old drop out taking yet another temp admin cover in Brecon Beacons Planning team to  46 year old head of Policy for a Bannau Brycheiniog, proud voice for the value of nature in the big societal challenges we face. 

    Proud to represent our vision.

    And maybe prouder still of the team that makes all this happen.  Great thinkers, overworked underpaid, that just care passionately about doing the right thing.  Inspiration to keep going despite the funding challenges, the impossible governance structures, the overly bureaucratic processes, completely disproportionate to our organisational size and powers. However not even their unending optimism and hope for the future is enough sometimes.

    Its not about the money (money), as Jessie J so aptly philosophises, I could have hustled my way through that I’m sure (just want to make the world sing).  Its more a structural than that.

    A couple of months ago I started to write a list of all the things that bothered me about the way National Parks functioned, it went a bit like this

    1. National Parks and National Landscapes only real powers are to act as planning authorities.  This skews our function to a focus on the preservation of the Park’s aesthetic value, potentially to the detriment of the way our place’s function (environmentally, socially, ecologically).
    2. National Parks and National Landscapes rely on collaborative working to deliver the purposes and duty, working with all public and statutory bodies.  However the language of the Act is woefully weak in holding any such body to account, especially in Wales.
    3. As landscape bodies, too often our focus seeks to act within the environmental sphere, to act on the immediate impacts of systemic decline.  We lack of the processes to enable our interventions programme to be delivered at more upstream locations.  Often it is socio-economic issues that drive ecological decline, but we have limited powers, or resources to support such a holistic view of management.
    4. We have this weird system of governance that is slow and cumbersome and top down and (I’m going to stop there before this rant gets out of hand.)

    My list of gripes are not earth shattering proclamations right,  these are things most people working, living, managing these landscapes would probably list too, probably come up with way more – I haven’t even started to unpick things like the impact of the designation on house prices and as a result, the demographic challenge that brings, or the cost of living, or the  complexity of the planning system,  coupled with the woeful lack of hard and soft infrastructure to service sustainable living….

    In fact this list of gripes is so universal, so obvious, that even DEFRA recognises them. 

    DEFRA’s 75th anniversary celebrations came in the form of a slickly produced, landscape soaring video. Where Ministers bedecked in gortex walked a rather misty looking Peak District moor.  Their message, delivered with the benevolence of those bearing the best of gifts, was a promise of reform of  creating better systems of governance and funding create a resource fit for the 21st century.

    This announcement is so welcomed,

    But (you knew there was a but right)

    Not all protected landscapes are in England.

    As things stand, not all protected landscapes will be supported by DEFRA’s eloquent vision. 

    Not that I’m complaining.

    I’m just jealous.

    It just doesn’t feel fair.

    So the great reform, is great partial reform, its a great reform for English National Parks and designated landscapes.  National Parks who are already fundamentally financially better off than their Welsh counterparts.

    And again on average, Welsh National Parks serve a resident and surrounding population rank more highly across indices of deprivation than our English counterparts.

    National ParkGrant Funding (2023/24)
    Lake District£8.372 million
    Peak District£8.103 million
    Yorkshire Dales£6.459 million
    North York Moors£6.029 million
    South Downs£5.836 million
    New Forest£4.907 million
    Broads£3.465 million
    Exmoor£3.937 million
    Dartmoor£4.164 million
    Northumberland£2.343 million
    Total (England)£53.615 million
    Snowdonia (Eryri)£4.505 million
    Pembrokeshire Coast£2.748 million
    Brecon Beacons (Bannau)£2.764 million
    Total (Wales)£10.017 million
    Cairngorms£5.989 million
    Loch Lomond & The Trossachs£4.634 million
    Total (Scotland)£10.623 million
    Grand Total£74.255 million

    (Table 1: comparison of grant funding by National Park Authority and Nation 23/4)

    What’s more the process of reform will be led by a panel of experts.

    Now I don’t have anything against experts, you might even call me one, similarly my friends, colleagues and trusted partners.

    But my gut feeling is that this is not enough, I am not sure that these problems can be solved by handing over the search for solutions to experts alone.  Yes we have relevant knowledge (but its just one form of knowledge) we have our perspectives (but not all perspectives). We also have baggage of years of struggle that seems to weigh us down .  What is more, in some cases to be successful reform will require the proverbial turkeys to vote for their festive demise. 

    But hang on I hear you dear imagined readers cry, this will be subject to consultation, everyone will have an opportunity to contribute.

    Potentially, but in reality, this allows a self selecting audience, who have the time, resource and ability to respond to the driest of all forms of communication – the written consultation – to make a case to said experts.  Or pay another expert to represent on their behalf.  As anyone who works in policy will tell you, often this becomes the intellectual equivalent of a stag fight, only instead of locking physical horns, the alpha struggle is who can out intellect the other, like a paper based debating society.  A game for the privileged few.

    I’m not sure its enough.

    So I had what my husband describes (complete with exacerbated eye roll) as ‘my flounce’ .  I decided to celebrate the  75th anniversary of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act, by handing in my resignation, 18 years in, I’m done.

    It’s a bit flouncy, but not full on flounce,  as yet I haven’t, you know,  left the metaphorical facebook group, I haven’t blocked any numbers, or turned off all notifications because I don’t want to face the counter challenge, nobody is writing on my socials ‘you alright hun?’.  I still want to be part of this world, and work to make these places the best they possible can.

    But, to leave  felt like the only option left, using the only bit of power I had left in me, to say this is not ok anymore.

    Because its not ok, it not ok, to leave the stewardship of something so precious as these awe inspiring places to anything other than the nation that they serve.  Or rather the nation and nature that they serve (do you see what I did there).

    We need to stop thinking we know it all, or know best, we are not your mother. 

    We need to start asking the people that these landscapes were designated for in the first place

    • What do you need from the National Parks of the future?
    • What do you think their priorities should be?
    • How do National Parks fit in your life?

    And, what’s more we need to ask the same questions to the natural world, our changing climate, our polluted catchments, our rivers, our air, our soil, our towns, our villages, what do you need to thrive? 

    How can we best serve you.

    Only by knowing the answers to these questions can we start to create the structures we need to deliver, based on an actual national mandate.   

    And

    This conversation, needs to be as joyful, and inspiring, and hope inducing as the landscapes are beautiful so that everyone is able to, and actually wants to contribute. 

    So people know how important to get involved.

    So as I await my P45 and start reluctantly to brush off a CV that is dominated by a lifetime working for Bannau,  I can’t help but wonder what the future will bring for both of us, what of National Parks of the future?  What about my future without National Parks as a steady anchor?

    I still truly believe that National Parks and National landscapes are important assets in any nation that is committed to the wellbeing and future resilience of its communities.

    I suspect I’m not unique in thinking this way, maybe there are others out there too who have entered into a reluctant agnosticism faced with the gap between our architects vision for us, and the reality of what we can actually deliver.

    And I guess that is actually where I am now, in this strange liminality between one world and the next.  Sitting here, listening, thinking, willing and keen to learn the lessons from the past, to roll up my sleeves and get busy with the plans for the future.  Maybe its enough if I just ask the questions now, champion the answers with anyone who will listen.

    Listening…

    In the hope that in 25 years time, when protected landscapes reach their centenary, we really will have something special to celebrate.

    Designing Protected Landscapes V2.0 – who is with me?